Questions that occurred and has been spiced with since the announcement two IPAD is whether I will replace my first generation iPad new. The answer for me is yes, because it's part of my job to live with this gadget and I can understand the strengths, weaknesses, and appeal. For most owners of original iPad, I guess they will survive for version 3.
Why is that? Big changes are less obvious about external redesign as much as what is in it. New things like the snappier processor and built-in graphics that Apple promises will be up to nine times faster than the first generation iPad. There are also two cameras, which will open the device to more applications.
Even so, Apple could go further, which is why I bet a lot of first generation devices would be happy to survive. As Steve Jobs mentioned during yesterday's event, the company did not really need to add much. Competitors such as Research In Motion and Hewlett-Packard is still scrambling to get their tablets out in the market, while Google's Android tablets like Xoom who come at a higher price than Apple's entry-level iPads with a smaller library of tablet-specific software.
That said, there are five specific things that Apple could add but did not. We'll break down what they are and what impact they have on the product:
Retina DisplayApple's "Retina Show" technology first appeared on 4 iPhone and then made it into the latest version of the iPod Touch. Marketing speak aside, it is a high-density pixel display that packs in about four times the number of pixels as the default view. How does this trickle down to the application is a text with a smooth edge and the ability for developers to add more detail.
This omission will win for eyeballs, but unfortunately the sailing ships in 2 IPAD is the same resolution as the first. As the game Retina Display-ready and the application on 4 iPhone has proved, the effect has a high resolution in a small place can have a dramatic effect on the details for things like text, and detailed image.
Before the announcement of two iPad, rumors had circulated that Apple plans to add Views retina to the tablet. The report is then updated to indicate that the Apple store for the third generation of the device.
SD card slot / USB port:iPad largely been positioned by Apple as a companion to traditional computer. But that does not mean people do not use it for things they normally would do on the computer, such as installing cameras to store, edit and share photos they've taken on their digital cameras. Solutions Apple so far has sold adapter camera accessories that use 30-pin connector to interface with a good iPad SD memory card, or USB camera.
USB ports on all Apple computers ship, and the latest generation of the MacBook Air Pro and have been nailed to the SD card slot, which attracted double duty as a media reader and how to actually boot the machine with the recovery image.

Rumors began circulating in early September last year that Apple was working to bring a mini-USB port next to the iPad. Extra fuel was added to the fire with a number of third-party manufacturers of the original case design iPad 2 cases with extra holes near the top. It later turned out to be a revision of the microphone placement of Apple, which previously located next to the headphone jack.

So can Apple add one of these to the next model? Maybe. Although that would give people less reason to come out $ 29 for the connector kit.

Lightning connectivity
Lightning-fast Intel ports that debuted last week (read our FAQs here.) So far, it is only available on Apple's MacBook Pro line, which has refreshed the same day Thunderbolt officially announced.

Lightning promised to bring more speed than USB 3.0, which for something like time sync IPAD could mean dramatically faster when installing the device to the computer. That could be a very important feature to have as storage in the iPad increases, which in the new iPad, it is not.

Despite the obvious move here is that Apple will not restrict the main route iPad about connectivity to a computer for someone who has just been released just a week ago. A good historical example of the limitations of technology and the emergence of the iPod firewire. When the iPod was first introduced, only works with Firewire and a Mac, before making the move to PCs. This product comes during an awkward time in history where the USB 2.0 technology has just started to become ubiquitous, and PC makers that support the four-pin, unpowered FireWire port i.LINK versus Apple's 6-pin plug.

The result is that you can sync your iPod, but you can not be filled at the same time. You also need some juice to ensure it can complete the synchronization without dying. Apple interim solution, before switching to a USB 2.0 full, is to ship the cable 2-in-1 which will allow users to transfer Firewire, while charging the device with a USB port. Apple finally removed Firewire support USB 2.0, but also in the process lost some sustained transfer rates, which can add up during long synchronization.

Lightning could end up being the answer to bring the speed back, though with the new MacBook Pro sports is only one port Thunderbolt, which was also used to plug into an external screen, not quite at the point of that kind of user regular plug will have an open and available at any time. That certainly could change a little further down the line though.